Warning: array_shift() [function.array-shift]: The argument should be an array in /home/www/vestris/www/config/ecran_securite.php on line 283

Warning: file_get_contents(/proc/loadavg) [function.file-get-contents]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/www/vestris/www/config/ecran_securite.php on line 284
Société Auguste Vestris - Mad Dog, Anyone?
  Auguste Vestris


Critiques / Reviews

Dans la même rubrique
In the same section

Vers une Mise sous X de Monsieur LG ?
Let’s talk Turkey !
Wayne McGregor & the Breakfast Oyster at the Palais Garnier
Fanny Fiat and Diana Cuni: two new Socii Honoris Causa in the Society for the Advancement of the Ideas of Auguste Vestris
The Man in the White Suit & Daphne Birnley
Mad Dog, Anyone?
The Canary Down Imperative - Jérémie Bélingard appointed Etoile
A Midnight Modern Conversation
The POB Internal Promotion Concours 2006

If it Ain’t Broke, Don’t Fix It
One Plummy Voice, raised in Dissent
Our Infant Wings
Reckless the Man!
More Power to Lopatkina !
Début of Emilie Cozette in Le Lac des Cygnes

Les rubriques
All sections :


Mad Dog, Anyone?
March 2007

Printable version / Version imprimable   |  1119 visits / visites

Proust, ou Les Intermittences du Coeur/’Choreography’
by Roland Petit
Opéra Garnier (March 2007)

Heavenstibetsie - Our Clement has gnawed on a bleedin’ chunk of Mad Dog.

Where was Animal Quarantine when we needed it?

The author of these lines has laboured under the impression that one of the tasks of the Opera was to encourage FRENCH choreography.

As it happens, Uncle Roland is no longer a Frenchman, or at least, he most definitely does not appear to be a French tax resident.

Following the Interesting and very Public Events of 1997 or so, when he decamped lock-stock-and-barrel to Lausanne or Geneva, virtually overnight - in response to a published report by the Cour des Comptes of the Bouches du Rhône on the Ballet de Marseille - it is the Swiss, and not the French, Tax Man, who has (unless I be sadly mistaken) enjoyed the fruits of Uncle Roland’s ’labour’.

’Lock-stock-and-barrel’ means that Uncle Roland withdrew from the Marseilles troupe all right to use his ballets, although they had been heavily subsidised for over twenty years by the French tax payer.

Lest anyone go ballistic (ballsistic?), one hastens to add that everything above is in the public domain.

How, or why, is Uncle Roland so swiftly returned to his Paris haunts? wreathed in smiles and laurels, and back toying with the dolls in his favourite dollhouse, viz., having people prance about the stage in the altogether, and simulating acts that twelve year-olds now get up to in the school playground.

Whether the artists do actually care to so prance about, is a moot point. In strictly legal terms, one finds one’s thoughts wandering to the equitable doctrine of ’undue influence’...

Why do people go to watch this ? Apart from the babes-in-the-wood, who haven’t the faintest of what is about to transpire, others go because they KNOW what they will see. They enjoy seeing in public, things that are PRIVATE. It gives a certain class of spectator the thrill of wielding power over the artists, whom they see as being humiliated.

And the press will, as usual, pour the honey-pot over what is, at best, a chunk of Mad Dog, gone badly off in the sun.

K.L. Kanter